Mason Alan Dinehart – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.
Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Mason Alan Dinehart.
The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient… Warren Buffet
BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Mason Alan Dinehart. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.
About Mason Dinehart
Mason Alan Dinehart is an Investment Adviser. Mason Alan Dinehart’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 68314 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/68314.
Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Mason Alan Dinehart.
Mason Alan Dinehart has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.
Accusations and Disclosures
You can find below, a quick snapshot of Mason Alan Dinehart’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.
DISCLOSURE 1 –
- Event Date: 8/12/1992
- Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
- Disclosure Resolution: Award / Judgment
- Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: THIS CASE INVOLVED A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT CLAIMING MISREPRESENTATION OF THE SALE OF $30,000 OF STOCK IN THE BOARDWALK GROUP, INC. (PARENT) OF ONE OF BOARDWALK CAPITAL COMPS. (SUBSIDIARY) REGISTERED REPS, [OTHER FIRM EMPLOYEE, A REG PRINCIPAL OF NASD. I WAS NAMED AS AN OFFICER OF B.C.C. THE FIRMS BROKER/DEALER SUBSIDIARY
- Damage Amount Requested: $30,000.00
- Damages Granted: $5,000.00
- Arbitration Docket Number: 90-00137
- Broker Comment: NO CLAIMS AGAINST THE BOARDWALK GROUP INC OR B.C.C. CLAIMS AGAINST D.J. WELCH DISMISSED DUE TO BANKRUPTCY FILING. [OTHER FIRM EMPLOYEE WAS ORDERED TO PAY [CUSTOMER $40,000; MASON DINEHART WAS ORDERED TO PAY [CUSTOMER $5,000. FORUM FEES FOR THE ARBITRATION HEARING WERE ASSESSED ON A JOINT; SEVERAL BASIS BETWEEN [OTHER FIRM EMPLOYEE; MASON DINEHART IN THE AMOUNT OF $2250. WHILE THE FOLLWING WERE NAMED IN THIS ACTION, NEITHER THE BOARDWALK GROUP INC, B.C.C. OR DJ WELCH ATTENDED THE HEARINGS. WHILE [OTHER FIRM EMPLOYEE ATTENDED PARTS OF THE FIRST SESSION, HE WAS ABSENT FOR THE SECOND SESSION. WHILE I ATTENDED BOTH HEARINGS NONE OF MY WITNESSES TESTIFIED DUE TO THE EXPENSE AND DISTANCE BETWEEN DALLAS, TX AND LOS ANGELES,CA. THE ARBITRATION PANEL GAVE NO EXPLANTATION WHATSOEVER IN SUPPORT OF THESE AWARDS. $5000 (STATED ABOVE) WAS FOR NOT DETECTING THE FRAUD AGAINST THE CLIENT WHO MR. DINEHART HAD NEVER MET OR SPOKEN WITH. HE MERELY APPROVED THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCS AS ACTING BRANCH MANAGER FOR BCC WHEN THE BUSINESS WAS SUBMITTED FROM DALLAS, TX.
DISCLOSURE 2 –
- Event Date: 9/28/1990
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: C02900008 (LA4321)
- DocketNumberAAO: 029000084321
- Initiated By: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.
- Allegations: ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF THE RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE IN THAT RESPONDENT MEMBER, ACTING THROUGH RESPONDENT DINEHART, ENGAGED IN A GENERAL SECURITIES BUSINESS WHEN IT FAILED TO MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT NET CAPITAL. AMENDED CASE ID NO. C02900008 (LA-4321) FILED 02/04/1991 ADDING RESPONDENT DANA JOSEPH WELCH ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF THE RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE IN THAT RESPONDENT MEMBER, ACTING THROUGH RESPONDENT WELCH, ENGAGED IN A GENERAL SECURITIES BUSINESS WHILE FAILING TO MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT NET CAPITAL; ON A SEPARATE OCCASION, RESPONDENT MEMBER, ACTING THROUGH RESPONDENTS DINEHART AND WELCH, FAILED TO MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT NET CAPITAL; AND, WELCH, WITH THE KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF RESPONDENT MEMBER, ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF A SECURITIES BUSINESS WITHOUT PROPER REGISTRATION WITH THE NASD.
- Resolution: Decision
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Monetary/Fine
- Sanction Details :: Amount: $7,500.00 Sanctions: Censure Sanctions: Suspension
- Sanction Details: DECISION RENDERED 03/22/1991 WHEREIN RESPONDENT MEMBER IS CENSURED, REVOKED FROM MEMBERSHIP AND ASSESSED COSTS OF $350; RESPONDENT DINEHART IS CENSURED, FINED $7,500, SUSPENDED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY MEMBER OF THE NASD AS A GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL AND FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONS PRINCIPAL FOR 60 DAYS AND THEREAFTER MUST REQUALIFY AS A FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONS PRINCIPAL, AND ASSESSED COSTS OF $350; AND, RESPONDENT WELCH IS CENSURED AND BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY MEMBER OF THE NASD IN ANY CAPACITY. 04/01/1991 – APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, WHICH RENDERED DECISION 08/28/1991, WHEREIN THE FINDINGS MADE AND SANCTIONS IMPOSED ARE AFFIRMED. IN ADDITION RESPONDENT DINEHART IS ASSESSED APPEAL COSTS OF $1,225.20. DECISION IS FINAL 09/27/1991. THE SUSPENSION WILL COMMENCE 11/18/1991 AND WILL CONCLUDE 01/16/1992. ***$9,075.20 FULLY PAID ON 12/26/91 INVOICE #91-02-1045***
- Broker Comment: IN THE APPEAL DECSION, THE NBCC STATED WE NOTE THAT TO MR. DINEHART’S CREDIT, HE DID ULTIMATELY NOTIFY THE NASD OF THE FIRMS’ NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY AND CLOSED THE FIRM. THIS WAS DONE WITHIN 6 BUSINESS DAYS OF MY SIGNATURE THE 12-29-89 FOCUS REPORT. NO PUBLIC CUSTOMER HAS BEEN INJURED OR DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF ANY ACTION OR INACTION ON MY PART.
DISCLOSURE 3 –
- Event Date: 2/15/1990
- Disclosure Type: Regulatory
- Disclosure Resolution: Final
- Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: C02910021 (LA-4285)
- DocketNumberAAO: 02910021-4285
- Initiated By: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.
- Resolution: Decision
- Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Monetary/Fine
- Sanction Details :: Amount: $6,000.00 Sanctions: Censure
- Broker Comment: NO PUBLIC CUSTOMER HAS BEEN INJURED OR DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF ANY ACTION OR INACTION ON MY PART. NET CAPITAL WAS IN FULL COMPLIANCE ON 9-30-88 AND 12-31-88, THE FOCUS REPORT, REPORTING DATES
According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.
FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.
Previous Associations
Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.
- LIGHTPATH CAPITAL, INC (CRD#: 34617) :: 11/2/2020 – 12/31/2021 :: SOUTHLAKE, TX
- SILBER BENNETT FINANCIAL, INC. (CRD#: 156435) :: 8/31/2011 – 3/14/2019 :: ENCINO, CA
- AMERICAN INDEPENDENT SECURITIES GROUP, LLC (CRD#: 135288) :: 4/14/2010 – 8/1/2011 :: SHERMAN OAKS, CA
- EMPIRE SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 2826) :: 1/19/2001 – 1/19/2010 :: EL SEGUNDO, CA
- LOCUST STREET SECURITIES, INC. (CRD#: 1703) :: 4/11/1999 – 12/31/2000 :: DES MOINES, IA
- ERIC EQUITIES, INC. (CRD#: 6312) :: 1/17/1992 – 3/31/1999 :: ORANGE, CA
- PROMONTORY CAPITAL CORPORATION (CRD#: 26152) :: 3/20/1990 – 4/3/1990
- NILCORP SECURITIES COMPANY (CRD#: 16553) :: 3/7/1990 – 3/20/1990
- BOARDWALK CAPITAL CORPORATION (CRD#: 10279) :: 4/22/1987 – 2/8/1990
- EMPIRE SECURITIES CORPORATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (CRD#: 2826) :: 6/4/1986 – 4/22/1987
- PACIFIC CAPITAL SECURITIES, INC. (CRD#: 15811) :: 7/24/1985 – 6/4/1986
- CARLSBERG SECURITIES CORPORATION (CRD#: 5338) :: 7/22/1971 – 8/7/1984
- 1901 CENTURY FINANCIAL CORP. (CRD#: 338) :: 1/29/1982 – 9/21/1983
The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.
Legit or Not?
Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Mason Alan Dinehart, but not limited to) can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.
Sometimes investment losses occur because advisors, stockbrokers, and even brokerage firms, commit fraud. Massimo Vignelli
Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.
There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –
- Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
- Unauthorized Trading
- Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
- Excessive Trading (Churning)
- Lack of Diversification
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
- Front Running of Transactions
- Breakpoint Sale Violations
- Negligent Portfolio Management
Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet.
How to Protect Yourself
We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.
Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
- Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
- Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
- Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
- Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
- Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.
Report Mason Dinehart
In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.
Mason Alan Dinehart – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.
Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →
This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:
- Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
- The CRD number (68314) for the broker – Mason Alan Dinehart
- Your complete contact information.
Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint. Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BROKERCOMPLAINTS.COM and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Scam Recoup,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BROKERCOMPLAINTS.COM.
To view the original article at BROKERCOMPLAINTS.COM, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/mason-alan-dinehart/.
